OpinionJournal.com is reporting the forces of the status quo at the World Bank now have another target in their destructive sights since getting rid of Paul Wolfowitz: The corruption fighters at the bank's Department of Institutional Integrity
OJ reported at the time that the fight over Mr. Wolfowitz had little to do with his girlfriend and everything to do with his anti-corruption efforts.
The controversy began with a 2005 report by the bank's Institutional Integrity unit into pharmaceutical drug procurement as part of the bank's Reproductive and Child Health I Project in India (or RCH I). The 16-page report was never been made public but OJ has included a link so that readers can see the whole report.
The key quote from the executive summary: "Evidence summarized below indicates that RCH I was subject to systemic fraud and corruption through i) bribery of Procurement Support Agencies (PSAs) and government officials; ii) falsification of performance certificates; iii) collusion among bidders; and iv) coercion of companies by cartel members and PSA officials."
The report cites "substantial losses" into the tens of millions of dollars or more, as well as evidence of corruption risk at other health care projects in India "representing over US$2 billion in Bank funding." It concludes that the findings are "sufficiently grave" to merit sanctions against specific individuals and companies.
Mr. Wolfowitz was thus presented with a plan for the bank to finance phase two of the RCH project without so much as a mention that there had been problems in RCH I. When he learned of the corruption findings in mid-2005, however, Mr. Wolfowitz decided to suspend further bank lending to that India project until the matter was cleared up.
After India's government committed to cleaning things up, Mr. Wolfowitz lifted his suspension and in August 2006 the bank decided to fund stage two and other health projects, to the tune of $672 million. But only a year later, this past July, did the bank get around to debarring two of the offending Indian companies, Nestor Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Pure Pharma Ltd., from bank contracts--and then only for three years and one year respectively.
It's pretty clear that the amount of profit {theft} that is available in the world markets must make International bankers drool in their villas. After the scandals in the United Nations, including the oil for food policies, the thought of one world government, one world bank, and the few who would enslave the rest of the world makes me just a bit paranoid--or a lot!
So what do people in some of the major countries think about globalization? Let's look at a recent Harris Poll conducted in July of 2007.
Globalization:
"Do you think Globalization is having a positive or negative effect in [your country]?"
Base: All EU adults in five countries and US adults
Great Britain France Italy Spain Germany United States
% % % % % %
Unweighted base 1040 1020 1084 1116 1046 1054
Positive effect 15 18 25 17 36 17
Negative effect 53 53 55 54 42 45
Not Sure 32 29 20 30 22 38
Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding
And how about those corporate executives who make millions, cook the books so that they qualify for extra large {more millions} bonuses, while cutting jobs, health care, and product quality by buying Chinese. What do people think about the corporate executives?
"In your opinion, do senior executives in your country earn too much each year in salaries and bonuses, too little, or about the right amount?"
Great Britain France Italy Spain Germany United States
Too much 79 % 54% 74% 72% 79% 77%
In a letter to an associate President Franklin Roosevelt wrote in 1933: "The real truth of the matter is, as you and I both know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government since the days of Andrew Jackson." (pg. 4, The Shadows of Power by James Perloff) It is a logical step to then own all governments, control all lending, and manipulate all economies; but hey, what's a conspiracy theory or two among friends...or are we?