The Sun has reported that Regents are joining Chancellor Jim Rogers in rejecting budget cuts.
"A week after Gov. Jim Gibbons got a letter from higher education Chancellor Jim Rogers rejecting Gibbons' request to plan for 5 percent budget cuts, some regents got into the act.
Regents Bret Whipple and Stavros Anthony sent a message Oct. 29 telling Gibbons they "were unaware of -- and disappointed by -- the tone and content" of Rogers' letter.
...
Anthony, who's planning to run for Las Vegas City Council, said he didn't have enough information to give an opinion on Gibbons' suggestion. He said the point of his and Whipple's letter "wasn't to slam anybody," but to ensure state and higher education leaders continued communicating.
Regent Steve Sisolak said although Anthony and Whipple are entitled to an opinion, 'I disagree with them very strongly. I think the chancellor presented a well-thought-out, pointed, direct letter to the governor.''
As I pointed out in an earlier posting, complete with excerpts, Rogers' letter was a rambling, often confused, and grammatically deficient letter. One would have hoped that someone in Rogers' position would have reviewed his letter before sending it to the Governor, but apparently he is so convinced of his intellect that he doesn't need to proofread. Therefore, I also have to wonder if Sisolek actually read the letter before praising it. It would also be nice if newspaper headlines actually reflected the content of the stories within, since the headline from the Sun suggests the Regents support Rogers, but the article has two Regents separating themselves from Rogers' letter. But of course, I am simply asking too much of publicly educated Regents, educators, politicians, reporters, and other Nevada citizens to write what they mean, when they barely teach writing and critical thinking in Nevada schools.
| Permalink
| Comments (0)