One of our readers wrote in about a letter written recently to Governor Gibbons--our other reader was following all day kindergarten news--and as the professor sent this to as many media outlets he could, we provide the letter here:
March 5, 2007
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jim Gibbons
Governor, State of Nevada
FROM: Hussein S. Hussein, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
SUBJECT: WHY IS A STATE EMPLOYEE UNDER SURVEILLANCE BY A STATE AGENCY FOR MORE TWO YEARS?
Request: This memorandum is a request to our newly elected governor to protect a state employee (Dr. Hussein Hussein) from a state agency (Nevada System of Higher Education "NSHE") and to immediately order the removal of the long-term surveillance by NSHE against me.
Background: On December 27, 2004, NSHE found itself on the front page of the Reno Gazette Journal (RGJ). The news was bad for NSHE. The news exposed rampant animal abuse at the UNR. The RGJ called the series of articles "Trouble on the Farm". The news hit the wires and was republished across the nation in the press. I exposed this animal abuse to the RGJ. I was "the source".
Within hours of the release of this news, a surveillance camera was installed outside of my laboratory and office at the UNR. The surveillance is 24/7 and continues to this day. I don't know if you have ever been under such a microscope. It is not very fun.
Why was this one State employee singled out for 24/7 surveillance for more than two years, all within hours of being exposed as a whistle blower in the press? Regardless of the answer to that question, the time has come for this to stop. This is where I need your help.
The law on spy cameras on campus is clear in at least two regards. One, criminal activity has to be suspected. Two, the UNR President must approve it.
Therefore, the UNR President has concluded I am a criminal in need of surveillance. But all I am is a State employee who is trying to do his job.
In the last two years, no criminal charges have been brought. I am an innocent State employee who happens to have blown the whistle on severe and systemic animal abuse. The surveillance continues almost as persistently as the animal abuse continues. You may recall the 400 drowned UNR sheep last winter. This continues, despite UNR having paid taxpayer money to the USDA for the 56 confirmed violations of the Animal Welfare Act.
Are we working as State employees in an Orwellian totalitarian State?
Well, maybe not everyone is, but I am.
I need your help, Sir.
I have endeavored for two long years to get an answer to the surveillance, to the spy cameras. No one has any answers.
NSHE State lawyers have no answers. NSHE private lawyers, McDonald Carano Wilson LLP, have no answers.
So, I need your help. Can you help me?
Thank you very much.
_______________
Reading about the surveillance kind of reminded me of that little known critter known as the Patriot Act which then reminded me of ....
Just 45 days after the September 11 attacks, with virtually no debate, Congress passed the USA PATRIOT Act.
Originally passed after the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Centers in New York, New York; the Act (full text) was formed in response to the terrorist attacks against the United States, and dramatically expanded the authority of American law enforcement for the stated purpose of fighting terrorism in the United States and abroad. , At the time the ACLU, who often supports frightening causes such as NAMBLA, correctly pointed out flaws that threaten your fundamental freedoms by giving the government the power to access to your medical records, tax records, information about the books you buy or borrow without probable cause, and the power to break into your home and conduct secret searches without telling you for weeks, months, or indefinitely. It has also supposedly been used to detect and prosecute other alleged potential crimes, such as providing false information on terrorism, but on March 9, 2007, the US Justice Department released an internal audit that found that the FBI had acted illegally in its use of the USA Patriot Act to secretly obtain personal information about US citizens. Federal courts have ruled that some provisions are unconstitutional infringements on civil liberties. The Patriot act had been renewed on March 2, 2006 with a vote of 89 to 11 in the Senate and on March 7 280 to 138 in the House. The renewal was signed into law by President Bush on March 9, 2006.
.
And then there is a little something called the Real ID Act which federalizes and standardizes state driver's licenses for all 50 states, and it will result in something that has been resisted in this country for a long time -- a national identity card.
The Real ID Act was pushed through Congress in 2005 with little meaningful debate. The changes should result in new fees and if you thought the lines were long at the DMV before, wait until everyone has to come in to replace their now obsolete license, loaded with paper to scan. Plus, there is a little more to consider about this new threat to Americans' privacy.
The law requires DMVs to store scanned copies of birth certificates, Social Security cards, and any other documents that individuals present when they apply for a license. It creates a national linked database allowing millions of employees at all levels of government around the nation to access personal data. It also mandates a nationally standardized "machine-readable zone" that will let bars, merchants, and other private parties scan personal data off licenses with greater ease than ever before, putting all that information into even greater circulation. Privacy activists, such as privacyrights.org, point out how this will create new opportunities for ID thieves to commit identity theft, while the supposed reliability of the documents should make them more valuable to counterfeit.
An anti-Real ID Web site that includes the status of efforts in all 50 states and what consumers can do to take action is at www.realnightmare.org.
But back to our professor and his letter. If I was the professor, I would either put up a giant smiley face, find creative ways to express my magic finger, or, heaven forbid, install my own camera aimed right at theirs.